Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety

  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Mission
    • History
    • Work with Us
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Awards
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • GSIP Toolkits
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Podcasts
    • Special Reports
    • Unreliable Airspeed
  • Industry Updates
  • The Foundation
    • About the Foundation
    • Mission
    • History
    • Work with Us
    • Leadership
    • Officers and Staff
    • Media/Communications
    • Aviation Awards
    • Join Us
  • Events
  • AeroSafety World
  • Toolkits & Resources
    • COVID-19 Crisis Resources
    • Fatigue Management
    • Flight Path Monitoring
    • Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions (GAPPRE)
    • Go-Around Project
    • GSIP Toolkits
    • Past Safety Initiatives
    • Pilot Training and Competency
    • Podcasts
    • Special Reports
    • Unreliable Airspeed
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Center
  • Login
  • Support Aviation Safety
Partners and Programs:
  • BARS
  • GSIP
  • SKYbrary
  • ASN

FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION HEADQUARTERS

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

  • Front Page
  • Industry Updates
  • ECA Suggests ‘Two out–All out’ Rule for Flying in Conflict Zones

News, conflict zones, Risk Management

ECA Suggests ‘Two out–All out’ Rule for Flying in Conflict Zones

by AeroSafety World Editorial Staff | January 24, 2020

The European Cockpit Association (ECA), an umbrella organization representing 40,000 pilots across Europe, has called for stopgap measures to address the problem of commercial aircraft flying in conflict zones until a more permanent solution is established to prevent tragedies like the recent shootdown of Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752 in Iran.

One proposal being floated by ECA is a “two out–all out” rule. If two European Union (EU) member states or two major airlines decide to suspend flights to a conflict zone, then all European airlines would cease flying to the area in question. “This means that passengers and crew on all airlines would benefit from the secret and non-shareable intelligence available to some ‘privileged’ authorities and airlines, and by looking only at public outcomes of their risk assessments,” ECA said in a statement.

“What we urgently need is a method of sharing and acting, not upon closely guarded intelligence, but upon the outcome of risk analysis about conflict zones,” ECA President Jon Horne said. “With these outcomes from different European airlines and states swiftly shared amongst each other and authorities, no European airline or pilot should be left in the dark — all have the opportunity to benefit from the effect of the privileged information of the best informed. Whilst many believe there should be an EU or international authority to take responsibility for the closure of hostile airspace, it is not something that shows any sign of happening soon, and so we need a pragmatic, industry-based setup that can provide meaningful protection in the here and now.”

The Iranian government said its military mistakenly shot down the Ukraine International Airlines Boeing 737-800 on Jan. 8, killing all 176 people aboard, during a period of heightened tensions in the region.

ECA lamented the fact that, more than five years after the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Ukraine, Europe has not developed an effective solution to sharing information with airlines about conflict zones.

Stopgap measures such as “two out–all out” are “neither conventional, ideal, nor the only solutions,” ECA Secretary General Philip von Schöppenthau said. “But the international failure to effectively cope with flying over and into conflict zones keeps costing lives. We can continue to analyze and point fingers at individual states or institutions, but this will not help us save those lives.”

Flight Safety Foundation has called for the international community to reaffirm its commitment to protecting civilian aircraft operating in conflict zones.

 

Share:

Print:

Key Safety Issues

  • Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
  • Loss of Control–In Flight (LOC-I)
  • Mechanical Issues
  • Runway Safety (approach and landing)
  • Sabotage/Intentional Acts
  • Midair Collisions (MAC)
  • Runway Safety (Conflicts)
  • Wildlife Issues
  • Fatigue
  • Cabin Safety
  • Emerging Safety Issues
    • Lithium Batteries
    • Safety Information Sharing and Protection
    • Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Related Content

conflict zones, News

Caution Urged for Flights Over Ukraine

U.S. joins Canada, France and the U.K. in outlining procedures for operations near the Ukraine-Russia border.

by Linda Werfelman

2021 FSF Press Releases

FSF Calls for Coordinated Response to Safeguard Commercial Aviation in Conflict Zones

Let’s not let history repeat itself.

by FSF Communications Staff

Flight Planning

Coping With Armed Conflict

Risk management has improved since Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down in 2014, but challenges remain.

by Linda Werfelman

Read more articles

701 N. Fairfax Street, Suite 250, Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Phone: +1 703 739 6700 Fax: +1 703 739 6708

Flight Safety Foundation on Twitter

The close encounter of an #EMS #helicopter and a Piper Seminole prompted the ATSB to encourage pilots to be more at… https://t.co/9TkW2TAtE4

June 23, 2022

Follow @flightsafety

Projects & Partners

  • Basic Aviation Risk Standard
  • Global Safety Information Project
  • SKYbrary
  • Aviation Safety Network
  • Donate
  • Advertise on our website
  • Sponsor & Exhibit at our Events
  • Work with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy

© 2022 Flight Safety Foundation

Join our group on LinkedIn